Reading a preliminary title report
A reader's question about the preliminary title report opens the escrow drawer at the reference desk: easements, liens, and exceptions, read line by line.

- Shelf
- IIIThe Escrow
- Call number
- ESC-001
- Filed
- Reading
- 6 min
The envelope reached the desk with a question folded inside. A reader, two weeks into an escrow on a two-bedroom above a stair street in Garvanza, had been sent the stapled pages the escrow officer told her to initial and return. She initialed the cover page. Then she did the thing almost nobody does, and kept reading. By the third sheet she had reached a column of paragraphs under the word exceptions, and the words inside them, easement, CC&Rs, rights of parties in possession, sat there refusing to explain themselves. Her question arrived on a slip, and we held it while we pulled the companion records: the ZIMAS parcel report from the LA City Planning portal, the entry on the county assessor's roll, and the standard forms published by the California Land Title Association, whose member companies write most of the title insurance in California.
What did the reader actually ask?
Stripped of worry, it was two questions. What does a preliminary title report actually show? And what does it not show? Not: is this a good house. Not: should she buy it. A reference desk does not answer those, and neither, in the end, does the document. She had signed for the report when it reached her, on the advice of everyone in the transaction who was not paying for the house. What she wanted was a reading, and a reading was something the file could support: the report itself, the parcel records behind it, and the recorder's indexes standing behind both.
A report, not a policy
The first thing the record settles is what the document is. A preliminary title report is not title insurance. It is the company's offer to sell a policy, written to forms and exception language standardized by the California Land Title Association, and it binds no one until the policy issues after closing. What it does, and does well, is put on paper the company's reading of the public record as of its date: the vesting, meaning who holds title; the legal description of the parcel; the taxes and special assessments showing due; and then the two schedules everybody skips. Schedule B, part one, lists requirements, the acts and documents needed before a policy can issue. Schedule B, part two, lists exceptions, the recorded matters the policy will not cover. The second list is where our reader stopped, and stopping there is correct, because that is the list that follows the house.
The exceptions, line by line
Read in order, the exceptions on an older hillside parcel usually tell the neighborhood's history in legal boilerplate. The tract restrictions the subdivider recorded when the lots were first laid out, in these hills often between the 1900s and the 1920s. A public utility easement along the front lot line, wide enough for the pole line and the gutter it has always carried. A slope or drainage easement running with the grade, the kind that matters where lots step down a hillside and one owner's yard sits above another owner's roof. Each exception is not a riddle; it is a citation, most often a recording number at the county recorder, pointing to an instrument any member of the public may ask to see. The report lists them. It does not translate them. That labor is left to the reader.
Why is there an easement where the driveway is?
Her real question, once we talked, was practical. The utility easement described along the front lot line lay, as far as she could tell, under the strip where she parked. Could she fence it, pave it, roof it with a carport? The record's answer is narrow. The easement gives the utility the right to use that strip for its facilities and its access; it does not take the land from her, and it grants her permission for nothing either. Whatever stands inside an easement stands at the utility's sufferance, with city encroachment rules layered on top. On the stair streets and sloped lots of Northeast Los Angeles, the same pages often carry older slope easements, and near lot lines the retaining walls that hold one yard out of another's foundation. The clinker brick and the knee braces of the house itself never appear in a title. The wall at the side line sometimes does.
Listed is not the same as owed
The requirements list raised her second worry. Schedule B, part one, named the seller's existing deed of trust, to be paid off and reconveyed at closing, and nothing else. She had heard the word lien somewhere and assumed the worst. The distinction the record draws is plain: requirements are the conditions the company sets before it will insure, and a deed of trust mapped for payoff by a selling owner is routine, not a red flag. A mechanic's lien from an unpaid contractor, a tax lien, a judgment docketed against a former owner, any of those would appear here, and any of them must be released or resolved before the file can close. The escrow number printed on every page ties the prelim to this transaction and no other, and the time to raise questions in writing is the contingency period, commonly seventeen days on the standard California purchase agreement.
Reading the prelim against the parcel
A prelim is a document about ownership, so we read it beside the parcel records that describe regulation and value. The county assessor's roll entry carries the lot dimensions, the year built, and the assessor's description, which should match the legal description on the report; where they diverge, someone has an old lot line adjustment to explain. The ZIMAS report from LA City Planning layers on the zoning, the hillside designation, and the Highland Park-Garvanza HPOZ overlay, whose full preservation plan sits on the shelf. The overlay is the telling example: the ZIMAS sheet shows it plainly, and the title report never mentions it, because historic district review is a regulatory matter, not a recorded burden on title. Two public files, two kinds of truth, and a buyer standing in escrow needs both on the table.
Where the record stops
The record stops earlier than people hope. The prelim says nothing about condition: whether the retaining wall leans, whether the sleeping porch was enclosed with permits, whether the slope behind the garage is moving. It does not draw boundaries on the ground; unless a survey is attached, the lines are described, never located. Rights of parties in possession, the phrase she underlined twice, flags the possibility of tenants, prescriptive claims, or unwritten agreements that appear in no index, and it names none of them. It will not settle whether the stair passage at the foot of the block is public or merely old. Title answers who owns, subject to what. It has never answered what a house is like on a Tuesday.
One pull, one walk
The slip went back with a short list. Order the instruments behind each exception from the county recorder, by recording number, and read the two that matter most, the tract restrictions and the easement. Pull the parcel map from the assessor and lay the lot lines on paper. Print the ZIMAS report and mark the overlays. Then walk the block with the pages in hand: find the pole line along the front strip, stand at the retaining wall, follow the slope the drainage easement runs with, and read the stair street at the foot of the hill on the way back up. Ask the escrow officer to explain any exception that still does not parse, in writing, while the contingency clock runs. The drawer closes easier when the questions arrive before the money moves.